In a recent statement, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has publicly challenged former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi regarding the events of January 6, 2021. His comments come in response to Pelosi’s criticisms of President Donald Trump for his handling of the National Guard during the Capitol riots. Chief Sund’s testimony sheds light on the communication breakdown and the decisions that contributed to the chaos of that day.

Key January 6 Figure Steven Sund Inks Book Deal, Promising New Details From  His Time As Capitol Police Chief

Chief Sund’s Testimony

Chief Sund has been vocal about the difficulties faced by law enforcement leading up to and during the January 6 insurrection. He revealed that he had requested National Guard assistance on January 3, 2021, but his requests were denied by Pelosi’s office. In his statements, Sund emphasized the urgency of his requests, stating, “It is long past time to be honest with the American people. On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it.”

Sund explained that under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970), he was prohibited from calling in the National Guard without specific approval from congressional leadership. He noted that on the same day he made his request, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but he was forced to decline due to a lack of legal authority.

Nancy Pelosi | Biography, Book, Age, & Facts | Britannica

The Delay in Assistance

Despite Sund’s repeated calls for help, he stated that the Sergeant at Arms for the House of Representatives denied his urgent requests for over 70 minutes. He expressed frustration, saying, “When I needed assistance, it was denied. Yet when it suited you, you ordered fencing topped with concertina wire and surrounded the Capitol with thousands of armed National Guard troops.” This statement highlights the perceived hypocrisy in the leadership’s response to security needs.

Nancy Pelosi says interim speaker Patrick McHenry is booting her from her  office : NPR

Pelosi’s Criticism of Trump

In the wake of the Capitol riots, Nancy Pelosi has been critical of President Trump, accusing him of delaying the deployment of the National Guard when the Capitol was under siege. She stated, “Donald Trump delayed deploying the National Guard on January 6th when our Capitol was under violent attack and lives were at stake.” Pelosi argued that Trump was activating the D.C. Guard to distract from his mishandling of various issues, including tariffs and healthcare.

136 Steven Sund Photos & High Res Pictures - Getty Images

The Irony of Timing

Interestingly, Chief Sund’s revelations come at a time when the narrative surrounding the January 6 events is still being debated. Pelosi’s criticism of Trump for federalizing the D.C. Guard contrasts sharply with the fact that the National Guard was indeed offered by the Pentagon on that day but was not utilized due to the bureaucratic hurdles that Sund faced.

Moreover, it is notable that during President Biden’s inauguration on January 20, 2021, approximately 25,000 National Guard troops were deployed to D.C. This deployment was intended to ensure safety and security during the event, raising questions about the decision-making process leading up to January 6 and the subsequent handling of security resources.

The Broader Implications

Chief Sund’s statements not only challenge Pelosi’s narrative but also highlight the complexities and failures in the security response on January 6. His testimony underscores the importance of clear communication and swift decision-making in crisis situations. The events of that day have led to ongoing investigations and discussions about the preparedness of law enforcement agencies in the face of domestic threats.

Conclusion

As the fallout from January 6 continues, the exchanges between Chief Sund and Pelosi illustrate the contentious political landscape surrounding the Capitol riots. Chief Sund’s call for transparency and accountability serves as a reminder of the critical need for effective leadership and coordination among various agencies during emergencies. The implications of these discussions will likely resonate as the nation reflects on the events of that day and considers measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.