BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) – Southern University law professor Kelly Carmena was suspended on Friday due to comments she reportedly made on social media in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death, as confirmed by the WAFB I-Team. The university has announced that it is proceeding with the termination of her employment as an investigation into her conduct commences.

In a post shared with WAFB, Carmena allegedly stated, “I will 1000% wish death on people like him. He is the epitome of evil, and I have no compassion, not even a minute ounce of it for people like him who go around spewing hate the way he does.” These remarks have sparked significant controversy and outrage, prompting immediate action from the university.

Southern University Board Chairman Tony Clayton confirmed the investigation into Carmena’s comments, emphasizing that her suspension is effective immediately due to her participation in conduct deemed prejudicial to the university. “The school will investigate this matter to finalize terminating her from the university,” Clayton stated. He further asserted that there is no room for what he considers hate speech within the institution.

“Distasteful statements should not be tolerated, particularly as it relates to death. That is tantamount to participating in and inciting violence and spewing hate,” Clayton said. “That conduct will not be tolerated at Southern University, period.” His remarks highlight the university’s commitment to maintaining a respectful and professional environment for both students and faculty.

The Southern University Law Center released a statement addressing the situation, noting, “The Southern University Law Center is aware of a recent social media post involving one of our employees that has raised concern. The views expressed in that post are the individual’s own and do not reflect the values or positions of the Law Center.” The statement continued, “We are reviewing this matter in accordance with the institution’s personnel policies and procedures. The Law Center is committed to fostering an environment of respect, inclusivity, and professionalism both online and offline.”

The reaction to Carmena’s comments has not been limited to the university community. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill also weighed in, expressing her disapproval of the remarks. “Great news,” she said regarding the university’s actions. “Political violence has NO place in a democratic society. The comments posted by this individual were abhorrent. Whatever your opinion is of Charlie, his assassination marked a dark day for all Americans and should be resoundingly condemned.”

Murrill emphasized the importance of free speech, stating, “This individual has a constitutional right to have opinions, and social media amplifies them. But she does not have a right to teach at a public law school.” Her statement underscores the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the responsibilities that come with being an educator in a public institution.

The situation has ignited a broader conversation about the role of educators in fostering a respectful discourse, especially in politically charged environments. Many are calling for a reevaluation of how educators express their personal beliefs, particularly when those beliefs may incite division or violence.

As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen what the final outcome will be for Professor Carmena. The university’s swift response indicates a strong stance against conduct that undermines its values and the principles of respect and inclusivity it seeks to promote.

In conclusion, the suspension of Kelly Carmena serves as a significant moment for Southern University as it navigates the complexities of academic freedom, personal expression, and the responsibilities of educators. The incident raises critical questions about the impact of social media on professional conduct and the expectations placed on those who educate the next generation of leaders. As this story develops, it will undoubtedly continue to resonate within the academic community and beyond, prompting discussions about the boundaries of free speech and the importance of maintaining a respectful educational environment.